This Day in Liberal Judicial Activism—July 28

(Carlos Jasso/Reuters)

2004—In dissent in Williams v. Attorney General of Alabama, Eleventh Circuit judge Rosemary Barkett opines that an Alabama statute that prohibits the sale of sexual devices (which Barkett also refers to colloquially as “sex toys”) violates substantive due process.

You might think that a case involving a challenge to the constitutionality of a statute prohibiting the sale of sexual devices would be about sexual devices. But, Barkett tells us, “This case is not, as the majority’s demeaning and dismissive analysis suggests, about sex or sexual devices.” Rather, “[i]t is about the tradition of American citizens from the inception of our democracy to value the constitutionally protected right to be left alone in the privacy of their bedrooms and personal relationships.”

Articles You May Like

Dear Democrats: Kill the Spending Bill
WATCH: Ainsley Earhardt Gets Dunked by Baseball-Throwing Nun, Sister Mary Jo
Shocking Helicopter Footage Shows Hundreds of Migrants Crossing Rio Grande to Join Camp under Texas Bridge
Martha MacCallum reacts to ‘shocking’ groundswell against Newsom
CBS, NBC Fully Back Milley’s Act of TREASON, Promised to Warn China

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *