Barr: Probe Into Russia Investigation’s Origins Has Yielded ‘Inadequate’ Explanations

US
Attorney General William Barr speaks at a news conference to discuss Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report, in Washington, D.C., April 18, 2019. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

Weeks into an investigation of the origins of the FBI’s investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 election, Attorney General William Barr said Friday that the probe has provided more questions than answers due to the “inadequate” and in some cases inconsistent answers he’s been given from the officials involved.

Asked during an interview with Fox News whether he knew exactly when the FBI began its investigation into the Trump campaign, Barr said he had not yet identified a reliable timeline.

“I’ve been trying to get answers to the questions, and I’ve found that a lot of the answers have been inadequate and some of the explanations I’ve gotten don’t hang together. In a sense I have more questions today than when I first started,” he said during the interview.

Pressed to explain what he was referring to, Barr would only say, “some of the explanations of what occurred.”

You Might Like

Barr told Fox that the investigation, which he disclosed to lawmakers during a congressional hearing last month, will eventually reveal whether the FBI puts its “thumb on the scale” by investigating and in some cases surveilling Trump campaign officials.

“People have to find out what the government was doing during that period. If we’re worried about foreign influence, for the very same reason we should be worried about whether government officials abuse their power and put their thumb on the scale,” Barr said before stipulating that he was “not saying that happened.”

Barr was maligned by congressional Democrats in the wake of his appearance on Capitol Hill last month for agreeing with Republicans’ contention that the Trump campaign was “spied” on. He defended that characterization during the Fox interview and reiterated that his job is to determine whether that spying was properly predicated.

“Government power was used to spy on American citizens,” he said in justifying his review. “I can’t imagine any world where we wouldn’t take a look and make sure that was done properly.”

In addressing whether the investigation was properly predicated, Barr suggested that it was “very unusual” for the FBI to rely on the Steele dossier, an unverified piece of opposition research commissioned by the Clinton campaign, to secure a FISA warrant to surveil Carter Page.

“It’s a very unusual situation to have opposition research like that, especially one that on its face had a number of clear mistakes and a somewhat jejune analysis,” Barr said. “And to use that to conduct counterintelligence against an American political campaign is a strange  would be a strange development.”

Articles You May Like

Mississippi Cop Arrested, Brought to Station in Own Cruiser After Shoplifting Sneakers in Uniform
Risky scientific experiments in our air and water are being carried out in the name of “climate change”
RNC Security Officer Who First Responded to J6 Pipe Bomb Claims Official Story ‘Makes No Sense’
Man in kilt arrested for allegedly shoving items up his rectum and returning them to shelves at antique stores
Businessmen are BOYCOTTING New York following Trump ruling: “I’m shocked at this”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *