What the Early Democratic Fundraising Numbers Mean

0 Comments

Elections
Senator Kamala Harris launches her campaign for President of the United States at a rally in her hometown of Oakland, Calif., January 27, 2019. (Elijah Nouvelage/REUTERS) Buy Xanax From China

Soma 350 Mg Reviews Democratic presidential campaigns are starting to release their fundraising totals for the first quarter. The early numbers show some surprisingly good news for Pete Buttigieg ($7 million) and good news for Kamala Harris ($12 million) and Bernie Sanders ($18 million).

https://www.justoffbase.co.uk/uncategorized/247nrw8m52

Some race-watchers think that if a campaign doesn’t announce their total fundraising quickly, it’s a bad sign, but don’t put too much stock in that. Beto O’Rourke didn’t announce his first-day fundraising total for a few days, and then announced his campaign raised $6.1 million, an impressive sum.

Diazepam 2 Mg Order Online

None of the announced candidates are likely to quit or alter their plans based upon the first-quarter fundraising numbers. If a candidate is running because he just wants to appear on a debate stage and be taken seriously for a while, he can keep going on a shoestring budget. Last cycle, Jim Webb raised $776,000 and Lincoln Chafee raised $418,000 in the entire cycle. Over in the GOP presidential primary, Jim Gilmore raised $824,000 in the entire cycle and stayed in the race until after the New Hampshire primary.

Order Xanax Canada

https://www.prehistoricsoul.com/5asoof53 But sometimes the early fundraising numbers show a candidate is striking a chord that resonates with primary voters. Last cycle, Sanders launched his campaign on April 30 and by the beginning of July, he had raised $15 million – an early indicator that grassroots progressives were looking for an alternative to Hillary Clinton and that the Vermont senator fit the bill.

https://equinlab.com/2024/01/18/v1p0y71zbmr But if there are any candidates who might be feeling a little early pressure, it’s probably the senators. Kirstin Gillibrand, Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren — they’re all well-established and represent wealthy states; they presumably already have an established group of loyal donors. Bad fundraising numbers will feed the perception that one or more are getting lost in the crowd.

https://www.prehistoricsoul.com/2lit39qt

Articles You May Like

New Lakewood Church Shooting Details Explain Sudden Media Disinterest
Americans are getting de-banked, but some companies are fighting back
San Diego teachers sue California governor and attorney general for forcing them to conceal transgender status of children from parents
Elon Musk Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize for Defending Free Speech
Poll: Two-Thirds of U.S. Workers Say Inflation Outpaced Income

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

https://fireheartmusic.com/vs5pv1uph0

https://masterfacilitator.com/sp0pcbtpw

https://www.chat-quiberon.com/2024/01/18/343l8to

http://www.wowogallery.com/x47we7q238w

https://sieterevueltas.net/gbu5khs

https://www.chat-quiberon.com/2024/01/18/gxk39uid